Submitted abstracts will undergo a blind review process. Accepted abstracts will qualify for paper presentation. Only registered presenters will be eligible to submit full papers for further review and consideration for publication.
Abstracts must be 250–300 words in length, excluding the title, and must be written in English. They should follow the prescribed structure: Purpose/Objective, Theoretical or Conceptual Framework, Methodology, and Key Findings or Expected Outcomes.
If there are two or more authors, the author presenting should be identified.
Submissions must present original work; as such, papers under review or published/accepted to any peer-reviewed conference/journal with published proceedings will not be accepted.
Submissions that have been previously presented orally, as posters or abstracts-only, or in non-archival venues with no formal proceedings, including workshops or PhD symposia without proceedings, are accepted.
Submitted abstracts will undergo a double-blind peer review process to qualify for presentation at the conference.
No part of the research paper should be generated using an AI tool or Large Language Model (LLM).
Editing the paper using a generative AI tool/LLM to enhance the language and readability is allowed, as this approach relies on the refinement of existing author-created material, rather than generating entirely new content.
Images created by AI tools or large-scale generative models are not allowed.
Full paper should be written in English.
The full paper should contain the following:
1. Title reflects the core of the research; maximum 25 words.
2. Introduction includes background, brief review of pertinent published literatures on the subject, rationale/establishment of the gap, statement of the problem, specific objectives of the study, theoretical/conceptual framework; 500 to 1000 words.
3. Literature Review includes a comprehensive summary of previous research done on the current topic and should help in establishing the gap of the study; 1000 to 2000 words.
4. Methodology includes research design, locale of the study data gathering procedures and statistical procedures, when applicable; 500 to 1000 words.
5. Findings and Discussion include presentation of the key results with corresponding discussion, analysis or interpretation; tables and other illustrative materials may be used; 2500 to 3500 words.
6. Conclusion, Recommendations, Implications; 250 to 500 words.
7. Reference contains all references or sources used and written in alphabetical order using APA format.
Submitted full paper will undergo and pass a double-blind peer review process to qualify for endorsement to publication.
Irish Mae Dalona
MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Philippines
Scopus ID: 57404829100
Rodney Jubilado
University of Hawaii-Hilo, Hawaii, USA
Scopus ID: 57214260967
Maya Khemlani David
University of Malaya
Scopus ID: 26038032000
Aileen Farida Mohd Adam
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
Scopus ID: 55250217500
Aldrin Lee
University of the Philippines - Diliman, Philippines
Scopus ID:
Endro Dwi Hatmanto
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Scopus ID: 58656554900
Ernisa Binti Marzuki
University of Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia
Scopus ID: 55866760500
Fitria Rahmawati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Scopus ID: 59138511900
Francisco Dumanig
University of Hawaii-Hilo, Hawaii, USA
Scopus ID: 49663332400
Ika Wahyuni Lestari
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Scopus ID: 59762392700
Marilu Madrunio
University of Santo Tomas, Philippines
Scopus ID: 57196445424
Merceditha Alicando
MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Philippines
Scopus ID: 58308764900
Raymund Palayon
King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand
Scopus ID: 57712203400
Shirley Dita
De La Salle University, Philippines
Scopus ID: 39961206800
Sittie Noffaisah Pasandalan
MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Philippines
Scopus ID: 59373392200
Tara Mustikaning Palupi
Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Scopus ID: 57972246600
Vinh To
University of Tasmania, Australia
Scopus ID: 57113435800